Key result
Moderate-to-severe dysplasia (OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.99-17.79; P=0.001), older age, and more medial osteotomy location were independent risk factors for superior ramus osteotomy non-union after PAO.
Why the study?
Few studies report risk factors for superior ramus osteotomy non-union after periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia.
What are the incidence and risk factors for superior ramus osteotomy non-union after periacetabular osteotomy in patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia?
Cohort (n=316)
What are the incidence and risk factors for superior ramus osteotomy non-union after periacetabular osteotomy in patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia?
Superior ramus osteotomy non-union occurs in nearly 10% of periacetabular osteotomies, with older age, moderate-to-severe dysplasia, and a more medial osteotomy location identified as independent risk factors.
Documents incidence of superior ramus non-union after PAO; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-established surgical treatment for hip dysplasia. Few studies report risk factors for the development of superior ramus osteotomy non-union. The purpose of this investigation was to document the incidence and risk factors for this complication. We identified 316 consecutive hips that underwent PAO for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. We developed and validated a technique to measure the superior ramus osteotomy location on anterior-posterior (AP) pelvis radiographs and computed tomography. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to evaluate the relationships between odds of non-union and potential demographic and radiographic predictor variables in univariate and multivariate analyses. Twenty-nine (9.2%) hips developed superior ramus non-union. Age {median [interquartile range (IQR)] 23 years (18–35) healed versus 35 years (26–40) non-united, P = 0.001}, pre-operative lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) [16° (11–20) healed versus 10° (6–13) non-united, P < 0.001] and the distance from the superior ramus osteotomy to the ilioishial line [15.8 mm (13.2–18.7) healed versus 18.1 mm (16.2–20.5) non-united, P < 0.001] varied significantly between groups. Using multivariate analysis, moderate-to-severe dysplasia [LCEA < 15°, odds ratio (OR) 5.95, standard error (SE) 3.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.99–17.79, P = 0.001], increased age (5-year increase, OR 1.29, SE 3.32, 95% CI 1.105–1.60, P-value = 0.018) and distance from the ilioishial line (3-mm increase, OR 1.67, SE 0.22, 95% CI 1.29–2.18, P < 0.001) were at increased risk of developing non-union. Superior ramus osteotomy non-union is common after PAO. Older age, moderate-to-severe dysplasia, and more medial osteotomy location were independent risk factors for non-union. Consideration should be made in high-risk patients for a more lateral superior ramus osteotomy and adjuvant medical and surgical interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sivamurugan et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in symptomatic acetabular dysplasia (n=316). Moderate-to-severe dysplasia (LCEA < 15°) was evaluated on superior ramus osteotomy non-union (OR 5.95, 95% CI 1.99-17.79, p=0.001). Moderate-to-severe dysplasia (OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.99-17.79; P=0.001), older age, and more medial osteotomy location were independent risk factors for superior ramus osteotomy non-union after PAO.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: