Key result
A body-machine interface monitoring only autonomic nervous system responses accurately detected motor execution with an average accuracy of 84.5%.
Why the study?
Can a body-machine interface based on autonomic nervous system responses accurately detect motor execution in healthy subjects?
Can a body-machine interface based on autonomic nervous system responses accurately detect motor execution in healthy subjects?
A body-machine interface using autonomic nervous system responses can accurately detect motor execution, offering a potential strategy for controlling robotic devices in patients with severe neurologic injuries.
May support autonomic-based interfaces for motor detection in healthy subjects; leaves open translation to neurologic injury populations.
Triggered assistance has been shown to be a successful robotic strategy for provoking motor plasticity, probably because it requires neurologic patients' active participation to initiate a movement involving their impaired limb. Triggered assistance, however, requires sufficient residual motor control to activate the trigger and, thus, is not applicable to individuals with severe neurologic injuries. In these situations, brain and body-computer interfaces have emerged as promising solutions to control robotic devices. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of a body-machine interface to detect motion execution only monitoring the autonomic nervous system (ANS) response. Four physiological signals were measured (blood pressure, breathing rate, skin conductance response and heart rate) during an isometric pinching task and used to train a classifier based on hidden Markov models. We performed an experiment with six healthy subjects to test the effectiveness of the classifier to detect rest and active pinching periods. The results showed that the movement execution can be accurately classified based only on peripheral autonomic signals, with an accuracy level of 84.5%, sensitivity of 83.8% and specificity of 85.2%. These results are encouraging to perform further research on the use of the ANS response in body-machine interfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marchal–Crespo et al. (2012) studied Healthy (n=6). Autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses vs. Rest periods was evaluated on Classification accuracy of motor execution (active pinching vs rest). A body-machine interface monitoring only autonomic nervous system responses accurately detected motor execution with an average accuracy of 84.5%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: