Often in clinical trials the observed responses are continuous but a regulatory agency will approve the drug only if the probability is sufficiently large that the efficacy measure exceeds a predefined threshold and the toxicity does not exceed another given threshold. Thus the measure of interest (utility) is based on dichotomized responses. We consider normally distributed correlated responses and build a utility function using the probit transform. Locally optimal designs are used as benchmarks for more practical designs such as composite and adaptive designs. We focus on D-criterion (i.e., all parameters of the dose-response model are of interest) and consider only two-stage designs. It is shown that the practice of reporting dichotomized responses leads to a substantial loss in the precision of estimated parameters (or in the power loss).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fedorov et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: