Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A conformal finite‐difference time‐domain algorithm for the solution of electrodynamic problems in general perfectly conducting 3D geometries is presented. Unlike previous conformal approaches it has the second‐order convergence without the need to reduce the maximal stable time step of conventional staircase approach. A novel proof for the local error rate for general geometries is given, and the method is verified and compared to other approaches by means of several numerical 2D examples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zagorodnov et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: