Why the study?
Does fluticasone furoate/vilanterol improve aortic pulse wave velocity compared to tiotropium bromide in patients with COPD and elevated arterial stiffness?
RCT (n=257)
blinded, double-dummy
randomized
Yes
Does fluticasone furoate/vilanterol improve aortic pulse wave velocity compared to tiotropium bromide in patients with COPD and elevated arterial stiffness?
In patients with COPD and elevated arterial stiffness, treatment with fluticasone furoate/vilanterol did not significantly differ from tiotropium bromide in reducing aortic pulse wave velocity at 12 weeks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinicians may choose either agent without differential concern for arterial stiffness; extends comparative data on vascular surrogates in COPD.
BACKGROUND: Increased arterial stiffness as measured by aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) predicts cardiovascular events and mortality and is elevated in patients with COPD. Prior investigation suggests that a long-acting β-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) lowers aPWV in patients with baseline aPWV ≥ 11 m/s. This study compared the effect of the ICS/LABA fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI), 100/25 μg, delivered via the ELLIPTA dry powder inhaler, with tiotropium bromide (TIO), 18 μg, on aPWV. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group, 12-week study compared FF/VI and TIO, both administered once daily. The primary end point was aPWV change from baseline at 12 weeks. Safety end points included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven patients with COPD and aPWV ≥ 11 m/s were randomized; 87% had prior cardiovascular events and/or risk. The mean difference in aPWV between FF/VI and TIO at week 12 was not significant (P = .484). Because the study did not contain a placebo arm, a post hoc analysis was performed to show that both treatments lowered aPWV by an approximate difference of 1 m/s compared with baseline. The proportion of patients reporting AEs was similar with FF/VI (24%) and TIO (18%). There were no changes in clinical concern for vital signs or clinical laboratory tests. CONCLUSIONS: No differences on aPWV were observed between FF/VI and TIO. However, further studies with a placebo arm are required to establish definitively whether long-acting bronchodilators lower aPWV. Both treatments demonstrated an acceptable tolerability profile. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01395888; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pépin et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in COPD (n=257). fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) vs. tiotropium bromide (TIO), 18 μg once daily was evaluated on aPWV change from baseline at 12 weeks (p=0.484).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: