Key result
Among 507,677 patients, operative management (30.6%) of emergency general surgery conditions resulted in higher or equivalent costs compared to nonoperative management through 180 days.
Why the study?
Many emergency general surgery conditions can be managed operatively or nonoperatively with diagnosis-dependent clinical outcomes, but the longitudinal cost implications of each strategy were unclear.
Does operative management reduce costs compared to nonoperative management in older patients with emergency general surgery conditions?
Cohort (n=507,677)
Yes
Does operative management reduce costs compared to nonoperative management in older patients with emergency general surgery conditions?
Operative management of emergency general surgery conditions is associated with higher or equivalent costs compared to nonoperative management up to 180 days, which may inform clinical decision-making when outcomes are similar.
Operative EGS management was associated with higher or equivalent costs through 180 days; leaves open whether nonoperative strategies reduce expenditures in select diagnoses.
OBJECTIVE: Many emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions can be managed operatively or nonoperatively, with outcomes that vary by diagnosis. We hypothesized that operative management would lead to higher in-hospital costs but to cost savings over time. BACKGROUND: EGS conditions account for $28 billion in health care costs in the United States annually. Compared with scheduled surgery, patients who undergo emergency surgery are at increased risk of complications, readmissions, and death, with accompanying costs of care that are up to 50% higher than elective surgery. Our prior work demonstrated that operative management had variable impacts on clinical outcomes depending on the EGS condition. METHODS: This was a nationwide, retrospective study using fee-for-service Medicare claims data. We included patients 65.5 years of age or older with a principal diagnosis for an EGS condition 7/1/2015-6/30/2018. EGS conditions were categorized as: colorectal, general abdominal, hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB), intestinal obstruction, and upper gastrointestinal. We used near-far matching with a preference-based instrumental variable to adjust for confounding and selection bias. Outcomes included Medicare payments for the index hospitalization and at 30, 90, and 180 days. RESULTS: Of 507,677 patients, 30.6% received an operation. For HPB conditions, costs for operative management were initially higher but became equivalent at 90 and 180 days. For all others, operative management was associated with higher inpatient costs, which persisted, though narrowed, over time. Out-of-pocket costs were nearly equivalent for operative and nonoperative management. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nonoperative management, costs were higher or equivalent for operative management of EGS conditions through 180 days, which could impact decision-making for clinicians, patients, and health systems in situations where clinical outcomes are similar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaufman et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions (n=507,677). Operative management vs. Nonoperative management was evaluated on Medicare payments for the index hospitalization and at 30, 90, and 180 days. Among 507,677 patients, operative management (30.6%) of emergency general surgery conditions resulted in higher or equivalent costs compared to nonoperative management through 180 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: