Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this post-marketing study in Japan, the occurrence of hospital-treated hypoglycaemia and severe hyperglycaemia requiring inpatient treatment was evaluated in various cohorts of people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) newly switched to iGlarLixi, a titratable, once-daily, fixed-ratio combination of long-acting insulin glargine 100 U/mL (iGlar-100) and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA, lixisenatide). In this retrospective, observational study, acute-care hospital data from adults with T2D were analysed from the Medical Data Vision database. In Cohort 1, the incidence rate of hospital-treated hypoglycaemia following newly prescribed iGlarLixi versus iGlar-100 was assessed. Cohort 2 was subdivided to evaluate the incidence rate of hospital-treated hypoglycaemia and severe hyperglycaemia requiring inpatient treatment in people switched to iGlarLixi from either a GLP-1 RA ± oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) or OADs alone (Cohort 2A) or from a GLP-1 RA and long-acting insulin ± OADs or long-acting insulin ± OADs (Cohort 2B). Of the 438 people in the iGlarLixi group and 9295 people in the iGlar-100 group in Cohort 1, who had a median follow-up duration of 52 and 44 days, respectively, there were zero and 0.011 (95% CI 0.006–0.018) events per person-year of hospital-treated hypoglycaemia, respectively. Cohort 2A included 201 people each in the GLP-1 RA ± OADs and OADs alone groups, with a median follow-up duration of 76 and 101 days, respectively, and Cohort 2B included 255 people in the GLP-1 RA and long-acting insulin ± OADs group and 623 people in the long-acting insulin ± OADs group, with a median follow-up duration of 73 and 62 days, respectively; no cases of hospital-treated hypoglycaemia or severe hyperglycaemia requiring inpatient treatment were observed. Consistent with clinical trials, this post-marketing database study observed that newly prescribed iGlarLixi has a low risk of serious hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia in Japanese people with T2D, irrespective of prior antidiabetic drug treatment. The goal of type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment is to manage blood glucose levels and to reduce the risk of diabetes-related complications. In addition to oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), T2D can be effectively managed using combination therapy with an insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), such as insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide (also known as iGlarLixi); however, these injectable drugs carry risks of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia. In this study, these risks were evaluated in people who were newly prescribed iGlarLixi in Japan and enrolled in a large hospital database. Individuals were divided into various groups; in Cohort 1, hospital-treated hypoglycaemia following newly prescribed iGlarLixi versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL (iGlar-100), with or without OADs, was assessed; in Cohort 2, we evaluated hospital-treated hypoglycaemia and severe hyperglycaemia in people who switched to iGlarLixi from a GLP-1 RA with/without OADs or OADs alone (Cohort 2A), or from a GLP-1 RA and long-acting insulin with/without OADs or long-acting insulin with/without OADs (Cohort 2B). In Cohort 1, hospital-treated hypoglycaemia occurred in none of the 438 people in the iGlarLixi group and 14 of the 9295 people in the iGlar-100 group after a median follow-up of 52 and 44 days, respectively. In Cohort 2A (402 people) and Cohort 2B (878 people), there were no occurrences of hospital-treated hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia after a median follow-up of 101 and 73 days, respectively. We concluded that newly prescribed iGlarLixi has a low risk of serious hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia in Japanese people with T2D, irrespective of their prior antidiabetic treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaneto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: