Key result
Implementation of standardised protocols and staff education reduced inappropriate preoperative neurology referrals by 16.6% (p=0.04) without compromising patient safety.
Why the study?
A lack of standardised protocols led to inappropriate preoperative neurology referrals and unnecessary antithrombotic suspension, causing surgical delays.
Does a quality improvement project with standardized protocols reduce inappropriate perioperative neurology referrals in patients undergoing preoperative evaluation?
Does a quality improvement project with standardized protocols reduce inappropriate perioperative neurology referrals in patients undergoing preoperative evaluation?
Implementation of standardized protocols and staff education significantly reduced inappropriate perioperative neurology referrals and associated costs without increasing stroke risk.
Standardized protocols may curb inappropriate neurology referrals and antithrombotic pauses; leaves open outcome impact in larger prospective studies.
Perioperative stroke, a rare but serious complication, refers to any thrombotic, embolic or haemorrhagic cerebrovascular event lasting more than 24 hours, occurring intraoperatively or within 30 days of surgery. Preoperative assessment is critical for identifying high-risk patients and mitigating stroke risks. Despite established guidelines, a lack of standardised protocols at our institution led to inappropriate neurology referrals and unnecessary suspension of antithrombotics. At our preoperative evaluation clinic, which assesses 100-120 patients daily, challenges arose in managing patients at risk of perioperative stroke. An analysis from April to September 2022 revealed that 83.3% of 24 neurology referrals were inappropriate, causing surgical delays due to medicolegal concerns, surgery postponement fears and unclear guidelines. To address this, a quality improvement project was launched to reduce inappropriate neurology referrals by 15% in 6 months. The secondary aim was to create standardised management guidelines and evaluate both the incidence of surgical postponements and perioperative stroke outcomes.The project employed the plan-do-study-act framework, with interventions including the development of easily accessible standardised protocols and staff education through roadshow education platforms. Postintervention analysis showed a statistically significant 16.6% reduction in inappropriate neurology referrals (p=0.04), surpassing the 15% reduction target. Surgical postponements due to preoperative neurology consultations also decreased. There were no perioperative strokes reported during the project period, ensuring that the patient safety was not compromised. Additionally, the intervention resulted in cost savings of approximately $2134 annually by avoiding unnecessary consultations.This project highlights the effectiveness of multidisciplinary collaboration in reducing inappropriate neurology referrals and improving perioperative stroke risk management. The standardised guidelines have streamlined workflows and enhanced patient care, with sustained efforts planned to ensure long-term adherence to these protocols. Future directions include expanding the implementation of standardised protocols to other specialties within the institution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Min et al. (2025) studied Perioperative stroke risk assessment. Standardised protocols and staff education vs. Pre-intervention practice was evaluated on Inappropriate neurology referrals (16.6% reduction, p=0.04). Implementation of standardised protocols and staff education reduced inappropriate preoperative neurology referrals by 16.6% (p=0.04) without compromising patient safety.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: