PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 26, 2005JAMA647 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Infusion on Mortality in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Structured PICO

Does high-dose glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) intravenous infusion reduce mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting within 12 hours of symptom onset?

P
Population
20,201 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting within 12 hours of symptom onset, mean age 58.6 years, worldwide (470 centers).
I
Intervention
High-dose glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) intravenous infusion for 24 hours plus usual care.
C
Comparator
Usual care alone.
O
Outcome
Mortality at 30 days after randomization.hard clinical

High-dose glucose-insulin-potassium infusion does not improve 30-day mortality or other major cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute STEMI.

Abstract

CONTEXT: Glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) infusion is a widely applicable, low-cost therapy that has been postulated to improve mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Given the potential global importance of GIK infusion, a large, adequately powered randomized trial is required to determine the effect of GIK on mortality in patients with STEMI. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of high-dose GIK infusion on mortality in patients with STEMI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trial conducted in 470 centers worldwide among 20,201 patients with STEMI who presented within 12 hours of symptom onset. The mean age of patients was 58.6 years, and evidence-based therapies were commonly used. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive GIK intravenous infusion for 24 hours plus usual care (n = 10,091) or to receive usual care alone (controls; n = 10,110). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, and reinfarction at 30 days after randomization. RESULTS: At 30 days, 976 control patients (9.7%) and 1004 GIK infusion patients (10.0%) died (hazard ratio HR, 1.03; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.95-1.13; P = .45). There were no significant differences in the rates of cardiac arrest (1.5% 151/10 107 in control and 1.4% 139/10,088 in GIK infusion; HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.74-1.17; P = .51), cardiogenic shock (6.3% 640/10 107 vs 6.6% 667/10 088; HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.94-1.17; P = .38), or reinfarction (2.4% 246/10,107 vs 2.3% 236/10,088; HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82-1.17; P = .81). The rates of heart failure at 7 days after randomization were also similar between the groups (16.9% 1711/10,107 vs 17.1% 1721/10,088; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.08; P = .72). The lack of benefit of GIK infusion on mortality was consistent in prespecified subgroups, including in those with and without diabetes, in those presenting with and without heart failure, in those presenting early and later after symptom onset, and in those receiving and not receiving reperfusion therapy (thrombolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention). CONCLUSION: In this large, international randomized trial, high-dose GIK infusion had a neutral effect on mortality, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock in patients with acute STEMI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 2005 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7c9c2121c5894b35c89456https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.4.437
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper