Key result
In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, pulmonary venous isolation using a large cryoballoon resulted in 77% freedom from AF at 12 months, compared to 72% with radiofrequency ablation (p=NS).
Why the study?
Does antral cryoablation with a large cryoballoon improve freedom from atrial fibrillation compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=185)
Does antral cryoablation with a large cryoballoon improve freedom from atrial fibrillation compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cryoballoon ablation is an effective and faster alternative to radiofrequency ablation for achieving pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparable AF freedom with large cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal AF; leaves open confirmation in randomized or persistent-AF cohorts.
BACKGROUND: To prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation, pulmonary venous isolation (PVI) at an antral level is more effective than segmental ostial ablation. Cryoablation around the pulmonary venous (PV) ostia for AF therapy is potentially safer compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a strategy using a large cryoablation balloon to perform antral cryoablation with 'touch-up' ostial cryoablation for PVI in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. METHODS: Paroxysmal and persistent AF patients undergoing their first left atrial ablation were recruited. After cryoballoon therapy, each PV was assessed for isolation and if necessary, treated with focal ostial cryoablation until PVI was achieved. Follow-up with Holter monitoring was performed. Clinical outcomes of the cryoablation protocol were compared, with consecutive patients undergoing PVI by RFA. RESULTS: 124 consecutive patients underwent cryoablation. 77% of paroxysmal and 48% of persistent AF subjects were free from AF at 12 months after a single procedure. Over the same time period, 53 consecutive paroxysmal AF subjects underwent PVI with RFA and at 12 months, 72% were free from AF at 12 months (p=NS). There were too few persistent AF subjects (n=8) undergoing solely PVI by RFA as a comparison group. Procedural and fluoroscopic times during cryoablation were significantly shorter than RFA. CONCLUSIONS: PV isolation can be achieved in less than 2 h by a simple cryoablation protocol with excellent results after a single intervention, particularly for paroxysmal AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kojodjojo et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (n=185). Pulmonary venous isolation by antral ablation with a large cryoballoon vs. Pulmonary venous isolation by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was evaluated on Freedom from atrial fibrillation at 12 months (in paroxysmal AF subjects) (p=NS). In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, pulmonary venous isolation using a large cryoballoon resulted in 77% freedom from AF at 12 months, compared to 72% with radiofrequency ablation (p=NS).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: