To study the effects of radio-frequency interference (RFI) on remote sensing data, we examined five years of WindSat ocean observations from regions affected by reflected X-band emissions from geostationary communication satellites. We compared measured brightness temperatures to modeled brightness temperatures obtained using mitigated retrievals as input to the WindSat parameterized radiative transfer model, demonstrating a considerable contribution to the radiometric measurements from interference. Comparisons of potentially contaminated retrievals of sea surface temperature (SST), wind speed, and wind direction with surface reanalyses confirmed that the presence of RFI can bias retrievals while also increasing retrieval uncertainty. Mitigation removed most of the biases. The quality of mitigated SST and wind speed retrievals was comparable to uncontaminated retrievals; however, the performance of first-rank wind directions was noticeably degraded. Recommendations are given on the use of contaminated and mitigated data, from radiance assimilation to climate studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: