Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A cyclone global navigation satellite system (CYGNSS) σocalibration analysis is presented using version 2.0 of the Level 1 dataset available on PO.DAAC. Three separate analyzes are conducted, namely, an examination of the specular bin location (in delay) and σorelationship, an investigation of the impact of recently improved characterizations of the GPS effective isotropically radiated power on CYGNSS σo, and an intersatellite σocalibration analysis. We first noted a correlation between the specular delay bin location and σo, where an increase in the specular delay bin resulted in an increase in σoregardless of the wind speed level; a specular delay bin location ranging from 4.75 to 5.00 and from 7.00 to 7.25 resulted in a 14.74 and 17.72 dB median σo, respectively. Noticeable improvements in the median σowere present in the version 2.0 dataset, when separating the data by GPS block type: for blocks IIR, IIF, and IIR-M, median σowere 15.39, 15.42, and 15.10 dB, respectively (compared to 19.38, 20.53, and 21.38 dB in version 1.1). Finally, an unexpected correlation between the instrument noise floor and σowas observed for all eight observatories while conducting the intersatellite σocalibration analysis. Approximately 0-1 dB absolute σodifference biases (with up to ~1 dB standard deviation) between spacecrafts were observed. A report of this analysis was presented to CYGNSS scientists and engineers, who eventually found an issue with the D/A DDM scaling algorithm. We expect better statistical performances in future releases of the data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saïd et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: