This article analyses the reforms to Romanias child care legislation introduced in 1997. It uses two perspectives on childrens rights to link the changes to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. The first perspective reviews the new legislation in terms of childrens rights to provision, protection, and participation, paying particular regard to the wider economic and social policy context of the reforms; the second looks at the new laws in terms of the implications of childrens rights for the family, the community, the state, and the international community. Throughout the discussion, attention is drawn to changes in social work management and practice which will be required to make a reality of the new legislation. The article then considers the way in which the discourse of childrens rights has been used to justify changes to the law on inter-country adoption. It is argued that the new legislation has actually secured the place of inter-country adoption in Romania whilst professing to give priority to domestic alternatives, and that reference to childrens rights has been used to justify and disguise this outcome. The discussion thereby highlights the vulnerability of the childrens rights discourse to the demands of international politics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan F. Dickens (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: