Key result
Overlapping 16-MDCT reconstruction minimizes coronary calcium Agatston score interscan variability to ~13%.
Observational (n=50)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates that overlapping reconstruction on 16-MDCT lowers coronary calcium score variability, indicating superior reproducibility compared with electron beam CT.
OBJECTIVE: High reproducibility on coronary calcium scoring is an important factor in monitoring the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. The purposes of this study were, using a 16-MDCT scanner with retrospective reconstruction, to compare the effects of thin-slice images and overlapping image reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium scoring and to compare 16-MDCT with electron beam CT (EBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent two sequential examinations using both EBCT and MDCT. For MDCT, images were reconstructed from the same raw data using the following thicknesses and increments (thickness/increment): 1.25 mm/1.25 mm, 2.5 mm/2.5 mm, and 2.5 mm/1.25 mm. The Agatston, volume, and mass scores were calculated on four pairs of image sets. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significant differences in interscan variability among image acquisition protocols and among measurement algorithms. RESULTS: Overlapping reconstructed images (thickness/increment, 2.5 mm/1.25 mm) obtained on a 16-MDCT scanner showed the lowest variability (mean, 13%; median, 10%) when compared with the Agatston score. CONCLUSION: The use of 16-MDCT with overlapping reconstruction by retrospective reconstruction, yielding low variability of coronary artery calcium measurement on two sequential scans, has an advantage over EBCT in monitoring the progression of atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horiguchi et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Coronary atherosclerosis (n=50). 16-MDCT with overlapping retrospective reconstruction (2.5 mm/1.25 mm) vs. Electron beam CT (EBCT) and non-overlapping 16-MDCT reconstructions (1.25 mm/1.25 mm and 2.5 mm/2.5 mm) was evaluated on Interscan variability of coronary artery calcium Agatston score. Overlapping 16-MDCT reconstruction (2.5 mm/1.25 mm) showed the lowest interscan variability (mean 13%, median 10%) for Agatston coronary calcium scoring compared with EBCT and other protocols.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: