For classification problems with significant class imbalance, subsampling can reduce computational costs at the price of inflated variance in estimating model parameters. We propose a method for subsampling efficiently for logistic regression by adjusting the class balance locally in feature space via an accept–reject scheme. Our method generalizes standard case-control sampling, using a pilot estimate to preferentially select examples whose responses are conditionally rare given their features. The biased subsampling is corrected by a post-hoc analytic adjustment to the parameters. The method is simple and requires one parallelizable scan over the full data set. Standard case-control sampling is inconsistent under model misspecification for the population risk-minimizing coefficients θ*. By contrast, our estimator is consistent for θ* provided that the pilot estimate is. Moreover, under correct specification and with a consistent, independent pilot estimate, our estimator has exactly twice the asymptotic variance of the full-sample MLE—even if the selected subsample comprises a miniscule fraction of the full data set, as happens when the original data are severely imbalanced. The factor of two improves to 1+1/c if we multiply the baseline acceptance probabilities by $c>1$ (and weight points with acceptance probability greater than 1), taking roughly 1+c/2 times as many data points into the subsample. Experiments on simulated and real data show that our method can substantially outperform standard case-control subsampling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2014 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: