Key result
Although 98.2% of surveyed surgeons agreed that frailty influences outcomes in emergency surgery, only 2.4% performed Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and 1.2% used a specific frailty screening tool.
Why the study?
Frailty is linked to poor postoperative outcomes in emergency surgery, but current perioperative practices, surgeons awareness, and barriers to implementing shared multidisciplinary models of care were unclear.
What are the current perceptions and practices surrounding the perioperative management of frail emergency surgery patients among surgeons?
Cross-Sectional (n=168)
What are the current perceptions and practices surrounding the perioperative management of frail emergency surgery patients among surgeons?
There is a significant gap between the perceived importance of frailty in emergency surgery patients and the actual implementation of formal frailty assessments by surgeons.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Current practices and barriers to perioperative frailty management remain poorly characterized; leaves open targeted implementation research before practice change.
Background Frailty is associated with poor post-operative outcomes in emergency surgical patients. Shared multidisciplinary models have been developed to provide a holistic, reactive model of care to improve outcomes for older people living with frailty. We aimed to describe current perioperative practices, and surgeons’ awareness and perception of perioperative frailty management, and barriers to its implementation. Methods A qualitative cross-sectional survey was sent via the World Society of Emergency Surgery e-letter to their members. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and reported by themes: risk scoring systems, frailty awareness and assessment and barriers to implementation. Results Of 168/1000 respondents, 38% were aware of the terms “Perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery” (POPS) and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). 66.6% of respondents assessed perioperative risk, with 45.2% using the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA-PS). 77.8% of respondents mostly agreed or agreed with the statement that they routinely conducted medical comorbidity management, and pain and falls risk assessment during emergency surgical admissions. Although 98.2% of respondents agreed that frailty was important, only 2.4% performed CGA and 1.2% used a specific frailty screening tool. Clinical frailty score (CFS) was the most commonly used tool by those who did. Screening was usually conducted by surgical trainees. Key barriers included lack of knowledge around frailty assessment, a lack of clarity on who should be responsible for frailty screening, and lack of trained staff. Conclusions Our study highlights the ubiquitous lack of awareness regarding frailty assessment and the POPS model of care. More training and clear guidelines on frailty scoring, alongside support by multidisciplinary teams may reduce the burden on surgical trainees, potentially improving rates of appropriate frailty assessment and management of the frailty syndrome in emergency surgical patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viswanath et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Surgeons' perceptions and practices regarding frail emergency surgery patients (n=168). Survey on perioperative frailty management practices was evaluated on Awareness and practices regarding frailty assessment and POPS model. Although 98.2% of surveyed surgeons agreed that frailty influences outcomes in emergency surgery, only 2.4% performed Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and 1.2% used a specific frailty screening tool.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: