Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We apply the methodology detailed in “Task-driven source–detector trajectories in cone-beam computed tomography: I. Theory and methods” by Stayman et al. for task-driven optimization of source–detector orbits in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to scenarios emulating imaging tasks in interventional neuroradiology. The task-driven imaging framework is used to optimize the CBCT source–detector trajectory by maximizing the detectability index, d ′ . The approach was applied to simulated cases of endovascular embolization of an aneurysm and arteriovenous malformation and was translated to real data first using a CBCT test bench followed by implementation on an interventional robotic C-arm. Task-driven trajectories were found to generally favor higher fidelity (i.e., less noisy) views, with an average increase in d ′ ranging from 7% to 28%. Visually, this resulted in improved conspicuity of particular stimuli by reducing the noise and altering the noise correlation to a form distinct from the spatial frequencies associated with the imaging task. The improvements in detectability and the demonstration of the task-driven workflow using a real interventional imaging system show the potential of the task-driven imaging framework to improve imaging performance on motorized, multiaxis C-arms in neuroradiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capostagno et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: