Persistent atrial fibrillation is a strong independent risk factor for perioperative thromboembolic events during pacemaker implantation, highlighting the potential need for appropriate anticoagulation in this subgroup.
May inform perioperative risk assessment in persistent AF; hypothesis-generating for anticoagulation trials during device implantation.
BACKGROUND: Thromboembolism (TE) is one of the most serious complications after pacemaker implantation. It has been demonstrated that several patient characteristics and different pacing modes are related to an increased risk of TE events during long-term follow-up. HYPOTHESIS: We propose that TE events occurring during the perioperative period of pacemaker implantation may be associated with certain clinical characteristics. METHODS: The potential risk factors of TE events were analyzed in 406 consecutive patients who underwent pacemaker implantation. RESULTS: We identified TE events in 11 patients (2.7%) within 7 days after pacemaker implantation. Four of the 11 (36.4%) patients died of complications of TE. Univariate analysis revealed that an age of >75 years (4.56 odds ratio [OR], P = 0.031), hypertension (3.59 OR, P = 0.028), diabetes (8.89 OR, P < 0.001), coronary heart disease (4.8 OR, P = 0.005), atrial fibrillation (AF) (5.68 OR, P = 0.006), persistent AF (10.36 OR, P < 0.001), and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (5.62 OR, P = 0.002) were associated with an increased risk of TE events. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that persistent AF (9.8 OR, P < 0.001) was independently associated with TE. The incidence of perioperative TE was not significantly different between patients with single- and dual-chamber pacemakers. CONCLUSIONS: We found TE events during the perioperative period in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation were not uncommon. Because persistent AF during the perioperative period was the only independent risk factor for perioperative TE, appropriate anticoagulation therapy may be necessary in those patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: