Group sequential design (GSD) has been widely used in pharmaceutical industry for drug development, especially in phase III pivotal studies. Efficacy boundaries in a GSD usually can be determined by an alpha-spending function. To determine the futility boundaries, a classical approach is to use a beta-spending function under the efficacious treatment effect assumption, ensuring target power. However, this method does not explicitly control the probability of stopping a trial before the final analysis under the null hypothesis. We propose an Optimal Futility stopping GSD (OFGSD) framework that selects futility boundaries to minimize total sample size while guaranteeing a prespecified probability of early stopping under the null hypothesis. An R Shiny App has been developed to implement this method. With the proposed OFGSD, one can also save total sample size by more than 8% in some cases to achieve the same study power and futility stopping probability (FSP) compared with using the traditional GSD with futility boundaries determined by a beta-spending function. This gain comes at a trade-off though: under the null hypothesis OFGSD in general leads to larger average sample sizes – in some cases OFGSD can cost 18% more on average sample size compared with the traditional GSD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: