Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuous improvement strategies are of increasing importance but difficult to establish and sustain. This paper uses multiple criteria decision‐making (MCDM), based on the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), as a means of systematising the decision process underlying strategy determination. A generic framework is developed to formulate an ideal strategy for a continuous improvement process (CIP) using AHP. The paper also discusses issues relating to consistency and sensitivity analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Labib et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: