Why the study?
The authors aimed to develop an algorithm for detecting myocardial infarction directly from raw ECG data without preprocessing and to evaluate its decision criteria.
Does an ensemble of fully convolutional neural networks improve the detection of myocardial infarction from raw ECG data compared to state-of-the-art approaches?
Does an ensemble of fully convolutional neural networks improve the detection of myocardial infarction from raw ECG data compared to state-of-the-art approaches?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A fully convolutional neural network operating directly on raw ECG data can detect myocardial infarction with high sensitivity and specificity, matching human cardiologist performance while providing interpretable decision criteria.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide an algorithm for the detection of myocardial infarction that operates directly on ECG data without any preprocessing and to investigate its decision criteria. APPROACH: We train an ensemble of fully convolutional neural networks on the PTB ECG dataset and apply state-of-the-art attribution methods. MAIN RESULTS: Our classifier reaches 93.3% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation with sampling based on patients. The presented method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches and reaches the performance level of human cardiologists for detection of myocardial infarction. We are able to discriminate channel-specific regions that contribute most significantly to the neural network's decision. Interestingly, the network's decision is influenced by signs also recognized by human cardiologists as indicative of myocardial infarction. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrate the high prospects of algorithmic ECG analysis for future clinical applications considering both its quantitative performance as well as the possibility of assessing decision criteria on a per-example basis, which enhances the comprehensibility of the approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2018 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: