Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in breast cancer survivors, but whether circuit resistance training reduces cardiovascular risk in cancer survivors is unclear.
Does 12 weeks of circuit resistance training improve aortic pulse wave velocity and cardiovascular risk factors in breast cancer survivors?
Does 12 weeks of circuit resistance training improve aortic pulse wave velocity and cardiovascular risk factors in breast cancer survivors?
A 12-week circuit resistance training program improves muscle strength and cardiorespiratory fitness, serving as an effective strategy to decrease cardiovascular risk factors in breast cancer survivors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support CRT feasibility in breast cancer survivors; leaves open effects on cardiovascular risk, needing larger trials.
OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in breast cancer survivors. While evidence shows circuit resistance training (CRT) is effective for improving muscle and cardiorespiratory fitness, whether CRT is an efficacious therapy for decreasing cardiovascular risk in cancer survivors is unclear. METHODS: Fifty-one breast cancer survivors were recruited to either 12 weeks CRT (n = 26), or a non-exercising wait-list control (n = 25). Two supervised 60 min CRT sessions per week were undertaken, comprising resistance and functional exercises, and aerobic exercise stations. Primary outcome measure was the gold-standard assessment of arterial stiffness, aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Secondary outcomes included: cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), upper and lower body strength, arterial wave reflections, central blood pressure and rate pressure product. CONCLUSION: Findings support the existing literature demonstrating that 12 weeks CRT improves muscle and cardiorespiratory fitness and is also an effective strategy for decreasing a proven cardiovascular risk factor in breast cancer survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: