Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Process mining, i.e., a sub-field of data science focusing on the analysis of data generated during the execution of (business) processes, has seen a change over the past two decades. Starting off in the early 2000's, limited to no tool support, nowadays, several software tools, i.e., both-source, e.g., ProM and Apromore, and commercial, e.g., Disco, Celonis,, etc., exist. The commercial process mining tools provide limited for implementing custom algorithms. Moreover, both commercial and-source process mining tools are often only accessible through a graphical interface, which hampers their usage in large-scale experimental settings. such as RapidProM provide process mining support in the scientific-based data science suite RapidMiner. However, these offer limited to support for algorithmic customization. In the light of the aforementioned, this paper, we present a novel process mining library, i.e. Process Mining Python (PM4Py) that aims to bridge this gap, providing integration with-of-the-art data science libraries, e.g., pandas, numpy, scipy and-learn. We provide a global overview of the architecture and of PM4Py, accompanied by some representative examples of its.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berti et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: