Comparison of ambulatory and polysomnographic recording of jaw muscle activity during sleep in normal subjects

Clinicians and investigators need a simple and reliable recording device to diagnose or monitor sleep bruxism (SB). The aim of this study was to compare recordings made with an ambulatory electromyographic telemetry recorder (TEL-EMG) with those made with standard sleep laboratory polysomnography with synchronised audio-visual recording (PSG-AV). Eight volunteer subjects without current history of tooth grinding spent one night in a sleep laboratory. Simultaneous bilateral masseter EMG recordings were made with a TEL-EMG and standard PSG. All types of oromotor activity and rhythmic masseter muscle activity (RMMA), typical of SB, were independently scored by two individuals. Correlation and intra-class coefficient (ICC) were estimated for scores on each system. The TEL-EMG was highly sensitive to detect RMMA (0·988), but with low positive predictive value (0·231) because of a high rate of oromotor activity detection (e.g. swallowing and scratching). Almost 72% of false-positive oromotor activity scored with the TEL-EMG occurred during the transient wake period of sleep. A non-significant correlation between recording systems was found (r = 0·49). Because of the high frequency of wake periods during sleep, ICC was low (0·47), and the removal of the influence of wake periods improved the detection reliability of the TEL-EMG (ICC = 0·88). The TEL-EMG is sensitive to detect RMMA in normal subjects. However, it obtained a high rate of false-positive detections because of the presence of frequent oromotor activities and transient wake periods of sleep. New algorithms are needed to improve the validity of TEL-EMG recordings.