PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 3, 2010New England Journal of Medicine3,269 citationsOpen Access

Oral Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism

View Full Paper

Structured PICO

Does oral rivaroxaban prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with acute DVT or those completing initial VTE treatment?

P
Population
4,645 patients in two studies: 3,449 patients with acute, symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and 1,196 patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of treatment for venous thromboembolism.
I
Intervention
Oral rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily for 3, 6, or 12 months in the acute DVT study; 20 mg once daily for an additional 6 or 12 months in the continued-treatment study).
C
Comparator
Subcutaneous enoxaparin followed by a vitamin K antagonist (either warfarin or acenocoumarol) in the acute DVT study; placebo in the continued-treatment study.
O
Outcome
Recurrent venous thromboembolismhard clinical

Rivaroxaban provides an effective, simple, single-drug regimen for both the acute and continued treatment of venous thromboembolism without the need for laboratory monitoring.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide a simple, fixed-dose regimen for treating acute deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and for continued treatment, without the need for laboratory monitoring. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, randomized, event-driven, noninferiority study that compared oral rivaroxaban alone (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) with subcutaneous enoxaparin followed by a vitamin K antagonist (either warfarin or acenocoumarol) for 3, 6, or 12 months in patients with acute, symptomatic DVT. In parallel, we carried out a double-blind, randomized, event-driven superiority study that compared rivaroxaban alone (20 mg once daily) with placebo for an additional 6 or 12 months in patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of treatment for venous thromboembolism. The primary efficacy outcome for both studies was recurrent venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in the initial-treatment study and major bleeding in the continued-treatment study. RESULTS: The study of rivaroxaban for acute DVT included 3449 patients: 1731 given rivaroxaban and 1718 given enoxaparin plus a vitamin K antagonist. Rivaroxaban had noninferior efficacy with respect to the primary outcome (36 events 2.1%, vs. 51 events with enoxaparin-vitamin K antagonist 3.0%; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.44 to 1.04; P<0.001). The principal safety outcome occurred in 8.1% of the patients in each group. In the continued-treatment study, which included 602 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 594 in the placebo group, rivaroxaban had superior efficacy (8 events 1.3%, vs. 42 with placebo 7.1%; hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.39; P<0.001). Four patients in the rivaroxaban group had nonfatal major bleeding (0.7%), versus none in the placebo group (P=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban offers a simple, single-drug approach to the short-term and continued treatment of venous thrombosis that may improve the benefit-to-risk profile of anticoagulation. (Funded by Bayer Schering Pharma and Ortho-McNeil; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00440193 and NCT00439725.).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 2010 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7cc743f40403d04c3f75achttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1007903
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper