Why the study?
Parenteral prostanoids are recommended for PAH treatment, but the prognostic relevance of delayed treatment initiation remains debated.
Does an upfront strategy with parenteral prostanoids improve PVR reduction and low-risk profile achievement compared to an add-on strategy in patients with PAH?
Does an upfront strategy with parenteral prostanoids improve PVR reduction and low-risk profile achievement compared to an add-on strategy in patients with PAH?
An upfront strategy including parenteral prostanoids in PAH is associated with a greater reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance and higher likelihood of achieving a low-risk profile compared to delayed add-on therapy.
Timing of parenteral prostanoid initiation may associate with PVR reduction in PAH; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
Parenteral prostanoids are being recommended in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment, but the prognostic relevance of delayed treatment initiation is still debated. This study assessed the impact of the timing of prostacyclin treatment initiation on reducing PVR and achieving a low-risk profile in PAH patients. The study enrolled 151 patients who started on parenteral prostanoids with different treatment strategies. All patients underwent right heart catheterization, clinical evaluation, and risk assessments at baseline and after 1-year follow-up. Patients with an upfront strategy including parenteral prostanoid plus one oral drug had -5.3 ± 6.2 WU (-50 ± 19%) reduction in PVR, patients with an upfront strategy including parenteral prostanoid plus double oral drug had -12.8 ± 5.9 WU (-68 ± 17%) reduction in PVR, while patients with an add-on strategy including parenteral prostanoid after oral drugs had -3.9 ± 3.5 WU (-23 ± 19%) reduction in PVR. An upfront strategy including parenteral prostanoids was independently associated with an increased likelihood of achieving the greater reduction of PVR compared with an add-on strategy. Additionally, the greater the severity of PH at the time of diagnosis, in terms of PVR and RV reverse remodeling, the higher the probability of treatment failure. An upfront strategy including a parenteral prostanoid is associated with the highest likelihood of achieving a low-risk profile and a greater reduction of PVR compared with parenteral prostanoid as an add-on to oral treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papa et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: