Why the study?
Numerous risk factors, especially infectious ones, are assumed to impact cervical cancer, but the expression of Herv-K env, np9, rec, and gag in cervical tissues required evaluation.
Are the expression levels of HERV-K env, np9, rec, and gag altered in cervical cancer and CIN tissues compared to normal tissues?
Are the expression levels of HERV-K env, np9, rec, and gag altered in cervical cancer and CIN tissues compared to normal tissues?
Altered expression of HERV-K associated genes in cervical cancer and CIN tissues suggests potential utility as diagnostic biomarkers.
HERV-K downregulation in cervical lesions warrants no practice change; leaves open biomarker potential pending larger validation studies.
Cervical cancer is considered to be the fourth common cancer. It is assumed that numerous risk factors, especially infectious ones, can have a detrimental effect on cervical cancer. In this study, we evaluated the expression of Herv-K env, np9, rec and gag in cervical tissues. After RNA extraction and cDNA sensitizing of 12 cervical cancer tissues and CIN3, 51 CIN1,2 and 18 normal ones, Herv-K env, np9, rec and gag were assessed using quantitative real-time PCR analysis. There was a decrease in the level of HERV-K env expression in cervical cancer and CIN 1-3 in compression with normal tissues. Cervical cancer and CIN3 indicated the most increase in expression. Meanwhile, we observed an increase in gag and rec expression in CIN 1,2; although cervical cancer and CIN 3 had a decrease in rec and gag expression, we did not report any changes in np expression. In conclusion, given the relationship between HERV-associated genes and cervical cancer, our study suggests that these genes can be useful for cancer diagnosis. However, further investigations are needed to provide a better perspective about the effectiveness of these genes in the diagnostic strategies of gastrointestinal cancer. These results are just an observation that could open a wider investigation to test the correlation between the expression of these genes and cervical cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tavakolian et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: