Why the study?
Aortic pulse wave velocity predicts cardiovascular events and total mortality, but previous studies proposing actionable thresholds had limited generalizability.
Does an aortic pulse wave velocity threshold of ≥9 m/s predict cardiovascular events and total mortality in the general adult population?
Does an aortic pulse wave velocity threshold of ≥9 m/s predict cardiovascular events and total mortality in the general adult population?
An outcome-driven aortic pulse wave velocity threshold of 9 m/s (10 m/s anatomical) independently predicts cardiovascular events and total mortality, supporting its use as a single integrated risk marker.
Provides generalizable PWV threshold for CVE and mortality prediction; extends prior work via calibration and validation in diverse populations.
BACKGROUND Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) predicts cardiovascular events (CVE) and total mortality (TM), but previous studies proposing actionable PWV thresholds have limited generalizability. This individual-participant meta-analysis is aimed at defining, testing calibration, and validating an outcome-driven threshold for PWV, using two populations studies, respectively, for derivation (IDCARS) and replication (MONICA). METHODS A risk-carrying PWV threshold for CVE and TM was defined by multivariable Cox regression, using stepwise increasing PWV thresholds and by determining the threshold yielding a 5-year risk equivalent with systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg. The predictive performance of the PWV threshold was assessed by computing the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and the net reclassification improvement (NRI). RESULTS In well-calibrated models in IDCARS, the risk-carrying PWV thresholds converged at 9 m/s (10 m/s considering the anatomical pulse wave travel distance). With full adjustments applied, the threshold predicted CVE (HR [CI]: 1.68 [1.15-2.45]) and TM (1.61 [1.01-2.55]) in IDCARS and in MONICA (1.40 [1.09-1.79] and 1.55 [1.23-1.95]). In IDCARS and MONICA, the predictive accuracy of the threshold for both endpoints was ∼0.75. IDI was significant for TM in IDCARS and for both TM and CVE in MONICA, whereas NRI was not for any outcome. CONCLUSIONS PWV integrates multiple risk factors into a single variable and might replace a large panel of traditional risk factors. Exceeding the outcome-driven PWV threshold should motivate clinicians to stringent management of risk factors, in particular hypertension, which over a person’s lifetime causes stiffening of the elastic arteries as waypoint to CVE and death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
An et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: