Why the study?
The study evaluated the diagnostic performance of AI-based CCTA for detecting CAD and assessing FFR in asymptomatic male marathon runners.
Does AI-based CCTA analysis accurately detect coronary artery disease compared to visual analysis in asymptomatic male marathon runners?
Does AI-based CCTA analysis accurately detect coronary artery disease compared to visual analysis in asymptomatic male marathon runners?
AI-enhanced CCTA demonstrates high sensitivity and negative predictive value for detecting significant coronary artery disease in asymptomatic athletes, though its low positive predictive value highlights a tendency for overestimation.
AI-CCTA feasibility in asymptomatic runners is hypothesis-generating; leaves open outcome validation before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) and assessing fractional flow reserve (FFR) in asymptomatic male marathon runners. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively recruited 100 asymptomatic male marathon runners over the age of 45 for CAD screening. CCTA was analyzed using AI models (CorEx and Spimed-AI) on a local server. The models focused on detecting significant CAD (≥ 50% diameter stenosis, CAD-RADS 3, 4, or 5) and distinguishing hemodynamically significant stenosis (FFR ≤ 0.8) from non-significant stenosis (FFR > 0.8). Statistical analysis included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. RESULTS: The AI model demonstrated high sensitivity, with 91.2% for any CAD and 100% for significant CAD, and high NPV, with 92.7% for any CAD and 100% for significant CAD. The diagnostic accuracy was 73.4% for any CAD and 90.4% for significant CAD. However, the PPV was lower, particularly for significant CAD (25.0%), indicating a higher incidence of false positives. CONCLUSION: AI-enhanced CCTA is a valuable non-invasive tool for detecting CAD in asymptomatic, low-risk populations. The AI model exhibited high sensitivity and NPV, particularly for identifying significant stenosis, reinforcing its potential role in screening. However, limitations such as a lower PPV and overestimation of disease indicate that further refinement of AI algorithms is needed to improve specificity. Despite these challenges, AI-based CCTA offers significant promise when integrated with clinical expertise, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and guiding patient management in low-risk groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kübler et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: