PURPOSE: Patients with corneal map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy suffer typically from recurrent corneal erosion, disturbed vision, or both. The purpose of this study was to assess the morphologic and functional long-term results of minimal invasive subepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) for corneal map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy. METHODS: Of a total of 390 PTKs performed between October 1994 and January 2004, 15 PTKs on 15 eyes of 11 patients were included in this single-center study. All patients had symptoms of recurrent corneal erosion; in 12 eyes, reduced visual acuity was observed. The median duration of complaints was 18 months. Using 193-nm excimer laser (MEL 60/70; Carl Zeiss-Meditec), a manually guided spot profile was applied in 7 cases (pulse energy, 12 mJ; repetition rate, 2/s or 3/s; 189-425 pulses). In 8 cases, a scanning slit mode was chosen (intended ablation, 1 microm/scan; repetition rate, 20/s; 150-483 pulses). In each case, a broad deepithelialization of the Bowman layer was followed by application of defocused overlapping laser pulses. RESULTS: Complete epithelial closure was achieved after an average of 3.5 +/- 0.6 days (median, 3 days). The mean follow-up was 4.8 +/- 3.0 years, with a maximum of 9.3 years. Best corrected visual acuity increased from 0.7 +/- 0.26 preoperatively to 0.9 +/- 0.16 postoperatively. The keratometric central power remained constant (preoperatively, 43.0 +/- 1.6 D; postoperatively, 42.6 +/- 1.0 D). The average keratometric astigmatism remained constant (1.3 +/- 0.9 D, preoperatively; 1.0 +/- 0.5 D, postoperatively). In the early postoperative stage, subtle superficial corneal opacities ("haze") were observed in 6 eyes (40%), being completely reversible during the follow-up in 5 cases. No recurrence of corneal erosion was observed during the follow-up. Asymptomatic dystrophic signs in the midperiphery became visible in 2 eyes 3 and 5 years after PTK. CONCLUSION: For corneal map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy, PTK using an excimer laser with low pulse energy and low number of pulses can be considered an effective and minimal invasive treatment modality to achieve a fast and durable epithelial closure, to prevent recurrent corneal erosions, and to increase visual acuity in most patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pogorelov et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: