Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The recent incidence and severity of sulfur (S) deficiency due to a decrease in atmospheric S deposition and greater S removal by crops requires reevaluating current S recommendation for corn ( Zea mays L.). Ten on‐farm field trials were conducted to evaluate corn response to S additions at sites in the Red River Valley of North Dakota and Minnesota between 2016 and 2017. Sulfur rates of 0, 11, 22, 33, 44 kg S ha –1 as granular (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 were broadcasted and incorporated prior to corn planting using randomized complete block design with four replications. Plant tissue S concentration and N/S ratios were determined at two corn growth stages (V6 and V12 in 2016, V12 and R1 in 2017) and grain yield was measured at harvest. Plant tissue S did not increase with S fertilizer at V6 and V12 stages in 2016 whereas in 2017, tissue S increased with 11 kg S ha –1 at two sites in the V6 growth stage. Yield was not related to both soil S and plant parameters. Corn yield increased with 11 kg S ha –1 fertilizer rate at two of ten locations. Lack of response at the remaining sites suggests that S from organic matter and mineralization was enough for crop growth and hence applied fertilizer S had no effect on yield. Core Ideas Corn grain yield increased with S fertilizer at two of ten sites. No response to S fertilizer occurred due to dry early growing season. Plant tissue tests were not reliable indicators in predicting response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaur et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: