In a previous study by the authors, a possibilistic harmonic load flow (PHLF) approach was presented. The PHLF was capable of modelling, through possibility distributions, uncertainties regarding magnitude and composition in both linear (LL) and non-linear loads (NLL) connected at the power system (PS). However, in that approach, possibility non-interaction between parameters for modelling LL and NLL was assumed. Such assumption is quite conservative and conduces to uncertainty overestimation. In fact, there are well-defined physical relationships among model parameters that constrain the variability of these. This study presents an improved approach which overcomes the aforementioned drawback by including both linear and non-linear equality constraints into the non-linear programming problem used to compute the PHLF. These linear and non-linear equality constraints are specifically used to model the balance of active and reactive power, respectively, at each bus of the PS. The equality constrains inclusion is supported from a possibility theory point of view by means of the ‘information fusion concept’. Influence of the possibility interaction consideration is evaluated in the IEEE 14-bus PS for harmonic analysis. Then, the complete PHLF is tested in a real 88-bus PS, and comparisons with Monte Carlo simulation results are performed and discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: