Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A study was undertaken to investigate the effect of water to cementitious material (w/c) ratio (ranging from 0·22 to 0·60) on the air-void system (air content ranging from about 10 to 70%) of foamed concrete, and their effects on the mechanical properties of foamed concrete without sand. The cementitious material used in this study was blended cement with 50% ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and 50% ground granulated blastfurnace slag (ggbs) by weight. The linear traverse method was used to characterise the air-void system, referring to air content, average air-void size, air-void frequency and spacing factor. The results show that although the same quality of foam was introduced, the air-void size and frequency, and hence spacing factor, of the foamed concrete varied with different w/c ratios and air contents, which in turn affected the mechanical properties of the concrete. For the different w/c ratios and air contents adopted, it was found that an air-void system with a spacing factor of about 0·05 mm, air-void size of 0·15 mm and air content of 40% was optimal in terms of achieving a high strength to weight ratio. The compressive strength of foamed concrete seems to be influenced by the spacing factor, w/c ratio and air content in relation to density. The results also indicated that the inclusion of air-voids in foamed concrete had a greater effect on compressive strength than the modulus of elasticity and it increases with increase of w/c ratio. The results of a numerical analysis concurred with the experimental observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wee et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: