Key result
HOMA-IR moderately predicts incident T2DM with an AUC of ~0.69.
Cohort
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: Prognostic thresholds to identify new type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) cases using the HOMA-IR have not been defined. We studied the HOMA-IR performance to identify incident T2DM cases and to assess if the thresholds varied according to urbanization and altitude in Peru. METHODS: Longitudinal analysis. The outcome was incident T2DM cases: self-report diagnosis and fasting glucose. The exposure was the HOMA-IR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was estimated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results are presented overall and stratified by study site (Lima, Tumbes, urban Puno, and rural Puno), rurality (urban, semiurban, and rural), and altitude (low and high). Overall for incident T2DM, the AUC was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.64-0.74) with an empirical threshold of 2.8 yielding a positive likelihood ratio of 2.30 and a negative one of 0.61; the positive and negative predictive values were 14.6% and 95.7%, respectively. The empirical thresholds varied within the variables of interest, for example, from 0.9 in urban Puno to 2.9 in Lima. CONCLUSIONS: Using the HOMA-IR to identify incident T2DM cases seems to yield moderate accuracy. The HOMA-IR could help improve identifying people at high risk of T2DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrillo‐Larco et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). HOMA-IR was evaluated on Incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (self-report diagnosis and fasting glucose) (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.74). HOMA-IR identified incident T2DM cases with moderate accuracy, yielding an overall AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.64-0.74) at an empirical threshold of 2.8.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: