Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A kinetic theory is used to model the field‐aligned distribution of auroral electrons along dipole magnetic field lines. Analytical formulae are obtained for the particle flux ( J ∥ ) and energy flux (ε) as functions of V , the electric potential difference between the equatorial source region and the ionosphere where the accelerated electrons are precipitated and detected by rocket instrumentation. For 1 ≪ eV/E o( ≪500, ε is nearly proportional to V ², and J ) is proportional to V ( E o) is the parallel thermal energy of the electrons; in the plasmasheet, E o( =0.2–0.6 keV). The observed values for the field‐aligned potential drop ( V ) usually range within the limits defined by this double inequality (i.e., 0.6 kV ≪ V ≪100 kV). The ohmic‐ like behavior of an auroral magnetic flux tube ( J ) ∝ V ) and the constancy of ε/ V ² has been found experimentally by Lyons et al. (1979). Using an asymptotic expansion for the kinetic electron precipitation flux and energy flux we have obtained a useful formula which relates the Lyons‐Evans‐Lundin constant K (=ε obs / V obs ²) to the auroral electron density and temperature in the source region (i.e., in the plasmasheet).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fridman et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: