Objective Evaluate the effect of thickness of high‐translucency (HT) CAD/CAM materials on irradiance and beam profile from a blue light‐emitting diode light‐curing unit (LCU) and on the degree of conversion (DC) and maximum polymerization rate ( R p max ) of a light‐cured resin cement (LCC). Material and methods The direct output from the LCU, the light transmission and irradiance ratio (IR) through one conventional composite and nine HT CAD/CAM materials (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, or 2.0‐mm thick; n = 5) were measured with a integrating sphere coupled to a spectrometer. The light beam was assessed with a beam profiler camera. The DC at 600 s and the R p max of one LCC was determined using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer ( n = 5). Data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey's tests, and Dunnett's test was also used for irradiance data ( α = 0.05). Results A significant decrease in irradiance through all materials occurred as thickness increased. Thin CAD/CAM materials improved light homogeneity, which decreased with the increase in thickness. The DC of the LCC directly exposed to light was the same as when exposed to 45%, 25%, 15%, or 5% IRs. R p max decreased with the decrease in IR. Conclusions Although the HT CAD/CAM materials reduced the irradiance from the LCU, minor effects were observed in the LCC's DC. Clinical significance Despite the light attenuation of blue light through different CAD/CAM materials that were up to 2‐mm thick, the degree of conversion of one brand of light‐cured resin cement was clinically acceptable when the LCU was used for 30 s.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castro et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: