Why the study?
Non-invasive fetal ECG is easily interfered by noise, degrading signal quality and making fetal heart rate monitoring challenging.
Does a CNN-based signal quality assessment and multi-channel fusion algorithm improve fetal QRS complex detection in non-invasive fetal ECG recordings?
Does a CNN-based signal quality assessment and multi-channel fusion algorithm improve fetal QRS complex detection in non-invasive fetal ECG recordings?
A novel signal quality assessment and multi-channel fusion algorithm improves the accuracy of non-invasive fetal QRS complex detection from abdominal ECGs.
May enhance NI-FECG quality assessment for FHR monitoring; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
Objective Non-invasive fetal ECG (NI-FECG) provides a non-invasive method to monitor the health of the fetus. However, the NI-FECG is easily interfered by noise, which makes the signal quality decline, leading to the fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring becoming a challenging task. Methods In this work, an algorithm for dynamic evaluation of signal quality is proposed to improve the multi-channel FHR monitoring. The innovation of the method is to assess the signal quality in the process of multi-channel fetal QRS (FQRS) complexes detection. Specifically, the detected FQRS is used as quality unit. Each quality unit can be a true R peak (TR) or a false R peak (FR). It is the basic quality information in this work. The signal quality of each channel is estimated by estimating the correctness of the detection results. Further, the TRs of all channels can be fused to obtain more reliable fetal heart rate monitoring. Main results Analysis results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is capable of selecting the good quality signal for FQRS detection achieving 97.40% $ PPV $, 98.33% $ SE $ and 97.86% F₁. Significance This work sheds light on the quality assessment of fetal monitoring signal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: