We discuss the role that negative results or “no-difference” findings play in research and research reviews of empirically supported interventions in school psychology. Specifically, we examine the dimensions of negative-results research within the context of randomized experimental between group and experimental single-case design, discuss some reasons for negative-results findings in these methodological approaches, and present some positive aspects of negative results in intervention research. We also examine the relationship of negative-results findings to replication research including direct replication, systematic replication, and clinical replication. We argue for publication of negative-results findings in our school psychology journals when these findings occur in the context of development of empirically supported interventions and translation of these interventions into school psychology practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kratochwill et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: