OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of a novel Paediatric Consultation Assessment Tool (PCAT). DESIGN: Developed to measure clinicians' communication behaviour with children and their parents/guardian, PCAT was designed according to consensus guidelines and refined at a number of stages. Volunteer clinicians provided videotaped real consultations. Assessors were trained to score communication skills using PCAT, a novel rating scale. SETTING: Eight UK paediatric units. PARTICIPANTS: 19 paediatricians collected video-recorded material; a second cohort of 17 clinicians rated the videos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Itemised and aggregated scores were analysed (means and 95% confidence intervals) to determine measurement characteristics and relationship to patient, consultation, clinician and assessor attributes; generalisability coefficient of aggregate score; factor analysis of items; comparison of scores between groups of patients, consultations, clinicians and assessors. RESULTS: 188 complete consultations were analysed (median per doctor = 10). 3 videos marked by any trained assessor are needed to reliably (r>0.8) assess a doctor's triadic consultation skills using PCAT, 4 to assess communication with just children or parents. Performance maps to two factors--"clinical skills" and "communication behaviour"; clinicians score more highly on the former (mean (SD) 95% CI 0.52 (0.075)). There were significant differences in scores for the same skills applied to parent and child, especially between the ages of 2 and 10 years, and for information-sharing rather than relationship-building skills (2-tailed significance <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PCAT appears to be reliable, valid and feasible for the assessment of triadic consultation skills by direct observation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howells et al. (2008) studied this question.