The interference of familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia (FDH), antithyroxine (anti-T₄) or antitriiodothyronine (anti-T₃) antibodies in serum free T₄ (FT₄) or free T₃ (FT₃) assays depends on the assay method: two-step immunoextraction, one-step labelled ligand (analogue or derivative tracer) or labelled antibody (solid-phase antigen-linked technique: SPALT) method. For FDH subjects, only FT₄ measurements by one two-step method gave reliable results in all cases. However, the overestimation was less marked with new SPALT assays than with previous analogue-based assays. In sera containing anti-T₄ antibodies, two-step assays and SPALT assays with a T₃-coated solid phase can be considered as reliable for FT₄ determination. All other methods including SPALT assays with a T₄-coated solid phase may give falsely high results. In sera containing anti-T₃ antibodies, SPALT FT₄ and FT₃ assays with a T₃-coated solid phase may give spuriously high values. Anti-T₃ antibodies do not interfere in two-step FT₃ assays and SPALT FT₃ assays with a T₂-coated solid phase, but may give high FT₃ values as measured by analogue or derivative methods. Moreover, SPALT free thyroid hormone assays may also be subject to interference from antibodies directed towards the assay solid phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sapin et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: