Why the study?
Current MAP monitoring relies on intermittent non-invasive cuffs or risky invasive arterial lines, and existing non-invasive alternatives face reproducibility issues and lack optimization for real-time prediction.
Does AnesthNet improve the accuracy of non-invasive mean arterial pressure estimation compared to existing deep learning models in surgical and intensive care patients?
Does AnesthNet improve the accuracy of non-invasive mean arterial pressure estimation compared to existing deep learning models in surgical and intensive care patients?
AnesthNet provides a highly accurate, real-time, non-invasive estimation of mean arterial pressure using routine operating room signals, offering a potential alternative to invasive arterial lines.
May enable non-invasive MAP monitoring in OR/ICU settings; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Monitoring mean arterial pressure (MAP) is essential for ensuring safe general anesthesia. Current practices rely either on non-invasive cuff measurements, which suffer from poor temporal resolution, or invasive arterial lines, which provide excellent accuracy and resolution but carry a significant risk of complications. Therefore, identifying alternatives to arterial lines in the operating rooms is a pressing need. Despite the importance of this issue in the community, clinically viable non-invasive MAP monitoring methods have yet to emerge. Existing approaches often encounter reproducibility issues, notably on large, open-source databases, and are not always optimized for real-time predictions. To address these limitations, this study introduces AnesthNet, a deep learning architecture designed for MAP estimation, using data exclusively from non-invasive and routine sensors such as photoplethysmography, ECG, and cuff oscillometer. AnesthNet was evaluated against the best-performing state-of-the-art deep learning architectures, using international standards to assess their performance on two of the largest datasets to date: VitalDB (2,833 patients) and LaribDB (5,060 patients). AnesthNet achieved superior performances, reaching an MAE of 4.6 (± 4.7) mmHg on VitalDB and 3.8 (± 5.7) mmHg on LaribDB. Our model also outperformed other architectures for different delays in cuff values and yielded no significant latency during inference, meeting clinical real-time requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joachim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: