DFT (B3LYP as well as a number of common exchange-correlation functionals) predicts a low-spin Fe(IV) ground state for Fe(P)F2 (P = porphyrinato), whereas electrochemical evidence has apparently indicated an Fe(III) porphyrin π-cation radical formulation for such a species. Ab initio CASPT2 calculations favor a high-spin porphyrin π-cation radical as the ground state by a significant energetic margin, thus dramatically overturning the DFT results. In contrast, both DFT and CASPT2 calculations correctly indicate a true Mn(IV) ground state for Mn(P)F2. The remarkable failure of DFT to correctly predict the metal- versus ligand-oxidized nature of Fe(P)F2 may have significant ramifications for the theoretical modeling of heme protein reaction pathways where until now the performance of DFT has raised little concern.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosh et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: