Why the study?
There is an unmet clinical need for therapeutics targeting the inflammatory stress response following MI to prevent negative left ventricular remodeling.
Does intravenous administration of Keap1-inhibiting protein-like polymers improve cardiac function in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
Does intravenous administration of Keap1-inhibiting protein-like polymers improve cardiac function in a rat model of myocardial infarction?
Keap1-inhibiting protein-like polymers provide cytoprotection and improve cardiac function post-MI in a rat model, suggesting a novel therapeutic approach for oxidative stress-driven cardiovascular diseases.
Myocardial infarction (MI) results in oxidative stress to the myocardium and frequently leads to heart failure (HF). There is an unmet clinical need to develop therapeutics that address the inflammatory stress response and prevent negative left ventricular remodeling. Here, the Keap1/Nrf2 protein–protein interaction is specifically targeted, as Nrf2 activation is known to mitigate the inflammatory response following MI. This is achieved using a Nrf2‐mimetic protein‐like polymer (PLP) to inhibit the Keap1‐Nrf2 interaction. The PLP platform technology provides stability in vivo, potent intracellular bioactivity, and multivalency leading to high avidity Keap1 binding. In vitro and in vivo assays to probe cellular activity and MI therapeutic utility are employed. These Keap1‐inhibiting PLPs (Keap1i‐PLPs) impart cytoprotection from oxidative stress via Nrf2 activation at sub‐nanomolar concentrations in primary cardiomyocytes. Single‐digit mg kg −1 , single‐dose, intravenous PLP administration significantly improves cardiac function in rats post‐MI through immunomodulatory, anti‐apoptotic, and angiogenic mechanisms. Thus Keap1i‐PLPs disrupt key intracellular protein–protein interactions following intravenous, systemic administration in vivo. These results have broad implications not only for MI but also for other oxidative stress‐driven diseases and conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mesfin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Advanced Materials