Poly( L ‐lactic acid) (PLLA) and poly( D ‐lactic acid) (PDLA) with very different weight‐average molecular weights ( M w ) of 4.0 × 10 3 and 7.0 × 10 5 g mol −1 ( M w (PDLA)/ M w (PLLA) = 175) were blended at different PDLA weight ratios ( X D = PDLA weight/blend weight) and their crystallization from the melt was investigated. The presence of low molecular weight PLLA facilitated the stereocomplexation and thereby lowered the cold crystallization temperature ( T cc ) for non‐isothermal crystallization during heating and elevated the radial growth rate of spherulites ( G ) for isothermal crystallization, irrespective of X D . The orientation of lamellae in the spherulites was higher for the neat PLLA, PDLA and an equimolar blend than for the non‐equimolar blends. It was found that the orientation of lamellae in the blends was maintained by the stereocomplex (SC) crystallites. Although the G values are expected to decrease with an increase in X D or the content of high‐molecular‐weight PDLA with lower chain mobility compared with that of low‐molecular‐weight PLLA, G was highest at X D = 0.5 where the maximum amount of SC crystallites was formed and the G values were very similar for X D = 0.4 and X D = 0.6 with the same enantiomeric excess. This means that the effect of SC crystallites overwhelmed that of chain mobility. The nucleating mechanisms of SC crystallites were identical for X D = 0.1–0.5 in the T c range 130–180 °C.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsuji et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: