Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A crystallographic and magnetic phase diagram of SmFeAsO 1− x F x is determined as a function of x in terms of temperature based on electrical transport and magnetization, synchrotron powder x-ray diffraction, 57 Fe Mössbauer spectra (MS), and 149 Sm nuclear resonant forward scattering (NRFS) measurements. MS revealed that the magnetic moments of Fe were aligned antiferromagnetically at ∼144 K ( T N (Fe)). The magnetic moment of Fe (M Fe ) is estimated to be 0.34 μ B /Fe at 4.2 K for undoped SmFeAsO; M Fe is quenched in superconducting F-doped SmFeAsO. 149 Sm NRFS spectra revealed that the magnetic moments of Sm start to order antiferromagnetically at 5.6 K (undoped) and 4.4 K ( T N (Sm)) ( x =0.069). Results clearly indicate that the antiferromagnetic (AF) Sm sublattice coexists with the superconducting phase in SmFeAsO 1− x F x below T N (Sm), while the AF Fe sublattice does not coexist with the superconducting phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamihara et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: