Cross-sectional study shows that higher Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index scores identify hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in adults, suggesting utility as a noninvasive screening tool.
Background: Visceral fat exerts a significant impact on the histopathology of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Hence, we evaluated the application of the Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index (CVAI), a novel visceral fat marker, in predicting and diagnosing hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis. Methods: After excluding individuals with liver disease or significant alcohol consumption, a total of 273 patients (57.9% males) aged over 18 were eligible for this cross-sectional study. Chinese Visceral Adiposity Index was calculated by age, Body Mass Index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Hepatic steatosis and fibrosis were measured by elastography. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: After adjusting for age, gender, metabolic diseases, and visceral obesity indices, each unit increase in CVAI elevated the odds of hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis by 3.3% (P = 0.002) and 2.9% (P = 0.001), respectively. According to the analysis of variance (ANOVA), the grades of liver steatosis had a great impact on CVAI (P < 0.001), and CVAI well-discriminated grades of liver steatosis. Furthermore, the stages of liver fibrosis greatly impacted CVAI (P < 0.001), but it cannot distinguish the stages of liver fibrosis. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) for S ≥ S1 was 0.800 (0.747 to 0.846), and for F ≥ F2 was 0.810 (0.759 to 0.855). Conclusions: We concluded that CVAI is a strong predictor and accurate diagnostic factor for liver steatosis and significant fibrosis; thus, it could be a tool for screening individuals at risk of liver steatosis and the irreversible complications of fibrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basham et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: