Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There are two conflicting hypotheses regarding the effect of dual-class recapitalizations. One holds that the shareholders with voting rights improve the position of all shareholders because of their ability to negotiate a better takeover price. The other contends that the recapitalization can be used by management to entrench themselves in a takeover situation. This study examines the characteristics of the firms that choose dual-class recapitalizations and shows that both types of behavior are evident and that the composition of the board explains which type of behavior a firm is likely to exhibit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bacon et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: