Building on Gestalt theory, this research introduces a holistic framework for defining artificial intelligence (AI) anthropomorphism, which guides the development of a parsimonious Scale of AI Anthropomorphism (SAIA). Through a systematic literature review, seven focus group discussions, and rigorous six-step scale development procedures, the research conceptualizes and validates a multidimensional framework that captures both external and internal human-like traits, including virtues and vices of anthropomorphic AI. Based on 2944 valid responses from five studies, a 40-item, six-dimensional parsimonious SAIA was developed, namely, human-like appearance, cognitive competency, adaptive capacity, social intelligence, morality, and fallibility. The scale demonstrated strong psychometric properties through comprehensive qualitative and quantitative validation. The SAIA serves as a robust tool for assessing the anthropomorphism of both tangible (e.g., robots) and intangible (e.g., chatbots) AI across normal service and service failure contexts. • Introduces a holistic framework for AI anthropomorphism using Gestalt theory. • Develops and validates a six-dimensional Scale of AI Anthropomorphism (SAIA). • Captures both external and internal human-like traits, including virtues and vices. • Demonstrates strong psychometric properties through five studies with 2944 responses. • Provides a generalizable tool for assessing AI anthropomorphism across AI systems and service contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: