Why the study?
Does phospholamban ablation exacerbate ischemic injury differently in male versus female mice, and is this mediated by nitric oxide?
Does phospholamban ablation exacerbate ischemic injury differently in male versus female mice, and is this mediated by nitric oxide?
Phospholamban ablation exacerbates ischemic injury, but female mice are partially protected through a nitric oxide synthase-mediated mechanism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sex differences in NO-mediated protection from phospholamban ablation in mouse ischemia are hypothesis-generating; leaves open translation to human cardioprotection.
Recent studies suggest a role for phospholamban phosphorylation during ischemia and reperfusion. The role of phospholamban in ischemia was studied by subjecting hearts from male and female wild-type (MWT/FWT) and phospholamban-knockout (MKO/FKO) mice to 20 min of ischemia-40 min of reperfusion while (31)P NMR spectra were acquired. ATP and pH values fell lower during ischemia, and postischemic contractility was less, in MKO and FKO versus WT hearts. After shorter ischemia (15 min), recoveries of contraction, ATP, and pH were greater in FKO than MKO hearts. To examine the role of nitric oxide (NO) synthases (NOS) in the protection in FKO versus MKO hearts, we utilized 1 microM l-NAME, a NOS inhibitor, or 100 microM S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP), an NO donor. Recoveries of function, ATP, and pH were less in l-NAME-treated FKO than untreated FKO hearts and greater in SNAP-treated MKO than untreated MKO hearts. In conclusion, phospholamban ablation increased ischemic injury in both males and females; however, female hearts were less susceptible than male hearts. Protection in females was decreased by a NOS inhibitor and mimicked in males by an NO donor, implying that protection was NOS mediated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cross et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: