The results of an inpatient five-day multidisciplinary professional assessment of 25 male clergy are presented. These clergy were referred for reasons of sexual misconduct, primarily sexual exploitation of vulnerable adults. All participants were evaluated according to DSM-IH-R diagnostic criteria and for sexual and other addictions. Assessment was made of their current level of impairment, need for short- and long-term treatment, and potential for return to practice. Conclusions are drawn that the study population was diverse and that no simple classification or treatment modality can be used to address clergy sexual misconduct. The authors also argue that while rehabilitation and restoration are possible, in most cases considerable effort, a 2-3-year process, and contractual provisions for ongoing monitoring will be required. A career change or transition may also be necessary. Recovered and rehabilitated clergy can, however, symbolize hope, healing, and forgiveness for the church.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Irons et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: